And I also have no problem with Spotify attempting to prevent this activity, either by making ad blocking technically infeasible (radio figured this out over 100 years ago), or by suspending accounts that violate their terms (especially free accounts, since the customer would have no case that Spotify owes them a refund or compensation). In other words, I have absolutely no qualms with users using ad blocking software, just like I have no problem with users using firewalls, antivirus software, or content restriction software. But if Spotify chooses (as appears to be the case, at least before this account suspension policy) to fulfill both requests independent of one another, I believe I have the right to make either request, both requests, or neither request. ads), I have absolutely no problem with that. songs) separate from requests for another resource (e.g. If Spotify wants to refuse to fulfill requests for one resource (e.g.
STEAM BROADCAST AUTOMUTE DOWNLOAD
That includes selecting which parts of a specific website or application I download and execute.
STEAM BROADCAST AUTOMUTE CODE
I believe I have the right to choose whenever possible which resources my computer downloads and what code my computer executes.
If you are going to pay for a service make it dropbox or something else more agnostic / flexible. And they were still insisting on spying on me and keeping the data, wanting to know as much as possible about what i was doing! Even though i was paying for the service :(Īnd to top it all the money was going to effectively top playing radio artists :( direct purchase of flacs from the artist FTW. I quit after the privacy policy got repeatedly worse and given that i was paying more than it cost to just buy all the music i listened to (when taken over years assuming youtube is as good when you are just showing someone a song not listening for quality). I was a paying customer for a long time but i dont like basically anything about how they work. They are also shockingly bad with snooping on you and sharing data.Īds that come from third parties are open to exploitation and not properly vetted, not to mention may be jarring to your experience. So your money goes to the artists listened to by others :( Payments to artists are based on total listens, not who is paying or who you listen to. (If that song actually exists, I cannot attest to its quality, because I swear I thought I was making it up.) After all, Spotify could be playing music to a cat in an otherwise empty house, with the mobile device quietly displaying "Now playing 'Meow Mix Theme - Metal Version' on device 'Bluetooth speaker'." There's something to be said for just playing the ad audio without trying to ensure someone is listening, or identifying who it might be. Maybe I lock the music program in the matrix, and control all the data it tries to get from the system, to the point that it cannot ever say what reality truly is. Maybe I also train another program to recognize the ads, and tell the first program exactly how far to skip ahead. Maybe I put a 30-minute buffering program on the audio stream that the music program is allowed to use, and tell that program to skip ahead during the ads. I'll crunch your cookies, and squash your pixel, and firewall your home-phoner. I'll block the ads, and block the ad-blocker detectors, and block the ad-blocker-detector-blocker detectors.
I pay to not get ads, so I'm not really motivated to explore avoiding them.īut if you try to advertise at me no matter what I do, or overestimate what I would pay, I will join in the arms race against your advertisers. Spotify is already a step ahead of that by preventing users from avoiding ads just by changing the radio station, and I think that the clever tricks with the volume are really pushing it in terms of user hostility. Traditional broadcast radio gets zero feedback from most receivers. Buy headphones with their own thumbwheel attenuator and/or mute button, or plug your corded headphones into an extension cord or dongle that has them.
0 kommentar(er)
